The psychological processes through which conflict exposure shapes conflict-supporting beliefs remain insufficiently understood, particularly in contexts of protracted intergroup conflict. To address this gap, we examined the mediating role of posttraumatic stress and depression in the relationship between conflict exposure and ethos of conflict, as well as the moderating influence of intergroup contact. Using data from 612 Moro adults in the southern Philippines who had experienced political violence, results revealed that greater conflict exposure was associated with higher levels of posttraumatic stress and depression, which in turn predicted stronger endorsement of ethos of conflict. Unexpectedly, intergroup contact amplified—rather than reduced—these indirect effects, indicating that contact under conditions of unresolved conflict can reinforce rather than diminish the ethos of conflict. These findings suggest that mental health distress may transform contact into a mechanism that sustains conflict attitudes, highlighting the importance of addressing trauma and depression as a precursor to contact-based peacebuilding interventions. Conceptualizing intergroup contact within a mental health framework offers a more nuanced understanding of when and how contact can either promote reconciliation or entrench divisions.
Natural disasters often compel communities to evacuate, exposing displaced individuals to challenges that undermine their mental well-being. While increasing studies have shown that post-disaster relocation experiences exacerbate mental health problems, a notable gap remains, most studies focused on relocation difficulties as a whole rather than examining the specific adversities associated with the displacement process itself. This is a critical oversight, as the nuances in post-relocation adversities variably affect relocatees’ mental health. To address this gap, this study developed and validated the Post-Relocation Adversity Scale (PRAS), a psychometric instrument designed to systematically quantify the multifaceted adversities encountered by individuals after forced displacement. Utilizing a multi-stage approach from generating items to rigorous psychometric validation, the EFA results extracted a 3-factor model in sample 1 (n=712; Tropical Storm Washi survivors) and confirmed the same model with a robust CFA fit in sample 2 (n=622; Typhoon Haiyan survivors). The factors are labeled as social resource deficiency, environmental-infrastructure resource deficiency, and financial-income deficiency. Moreover, LCA analysis in sample 2 identified four distinct profiles: low post-disaster relocation adversity, moderate post-disaster relocation adversity, moderate post-disaster relocation adversity with low social resource deficiency, and high post-disaster relocation adversity. Furthermore, the results showed a significantly varied association between the PRAS's three factors and different mental health outcomes. Overall, the results provide evidence for PRAS’s validity, reliability, and utility in assessing post-disaster relocation difficulties. This instrument offers a refined tool for researchers and policymakers to understand and address displacement-related psychological sequelae by developing intervention specific to the domains of adversities.
The Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K-10) is widely utilized to assess non-specific psychological distress. However, when applied to COVID-19 pandemic experiences, its psychometric properties have not been examined. This study investigated the factor structure, reliability, and latent profile of K-10 using data from 3032 Filipino teachers who reflected on their pandemic-related adversity prior to completing K-10. Confirmatory factor analyses were conducted to evaluate five extant models of the K-10’s structure, supporting the two-factor model (i.e., anxiety and depression) as best fitting the data. Both factors showed excellent internal reliability, and criterion-related validity was supported by correlations with anxiety and depression measures. Latent profile analysis revealed a four-class solution, identifying four distinct levels of distress severity. Overall, the contextualized K-10 demonstrated sound psychometric properties, which corroborates and extends its reliability and validity as a measure of pandemic-related distress. Further, the results offer insights into the dimensionality and distress profiles of the K-10 among teachers. Broadly, the findings highlight the importance of valid instruments in assessing contextualized psychological distress.
This study explores the lived experiences of World War II survivors from Lipa, Batangas, with a focus on how they found healing and forgiveness in the decades after the war. Using a qualitative descriptive phenomenological approach, the research aimed to capture personal narratives of their experiences and feelings during the war, which include trauma, resilience, healing, forgiveness, and reconciliation. In-depth interviews were conducted with survivors who experienced the Japanese occupation and the atrocities committed in the area. Through text analytics and thematic analysis, six overarching themes were identified: (1) trauma and atrocities experienced during the war, (2) emotional reactions to wartime experiences, (3) coping and survival strategies, (4) changing perceptions toward the Japanese over time, (5) role of family and community in healing, and (6) faith and spirituality as a path to healing. Findings reveal that while wartime memories remain vivid and painful, many survivors have achieved a sense of peace, healing, and forgiveness through faith, family support, and acts of reconciliation. This study contributes not only to war trauma and peacebuilding, but also to Batangas Studies and Philippine Local History, highlighting the effects of war and the healing power of forgiveness in the years that followed.
Dear Sir/Madam,
Attached is the manuscript for Oral Presentation. The title of the study is The Interrelationship Between Spirituality and Resilience Among Nursing Students: A Holistic Approach to Psychotrauma Work.
I am anticipating a favorable response from you.
Resepectfully,
Prof. Gloria Shiela E. Coyoca
Numerous studies have shown the mental health consequences of COVD-19 pandemic. However, there is a scant of literature on the cardinal requirement of these mental health problems - one’s dysfunctionality. The current study responds to this scarcity of studies by looking into the latent factor structure and latent groupings based on the indicators of dysfunctionality and assessed further its associated risk factors. Utilizing a sample of 415 left-behind emerging adult children (LBEAC), the results reveal a well-fitting one-factor structure with 3 latent groups based on the severity levels of dysfunctionality. The data further show a number of risk factors of dysfunctionality in LBEAC amidst the pandemic. Overall, the findings provide the validity of WHO-DAS notion of dysfunctionality and underscore its pragmatic importance in the development of interventions and policies in LBEAC amidst pandemic.
Keywords: Left-behind emerging adult children, mental health, (dys)functionality, risk factors, latent structure, COVID-19 pandemic
Abstract
Mental health has been a major concern in the college-aged population. With the ideal counselor-student ratio of 1 to 250 and with the increasing rates of college students with various mental health concerns, the treatment gap between students’ need and the service utilization suggests that more accessible mental health services are needed. The aim of the present study is to design a school-based Transdiagnostic Intervention which can be applied across a range of mental disorders to treat an array of commonly co-occurring symptoms at the same time. Among the two-hundred one (201) students who meet the cut-off score for psychological distress, ninety-seven (97) of the participants agreed and were included in the 2-arm randomized controlled trial. Participants (n=36) assigned to Transdiagnostic Intervention (TI) were assessed before the treatment and at the end of the treatment. Care-As-Usual (CAU) participants’ (n=34) pre-test and post-test were assessed on the same time period with TI participants. After a 2-month period, both the TI and CAU groups resulted in lower psychological distress scores. The effects of TI on intolerance of uncertainty, repetitive negative thinking, experiential avoidance and distress tolerance were evident in the study. The effectiveness of a Transdiagnostic Intervention as a school-based mental health program in low-income, Asian country responds to the call for a shift towards alternative low-intensity treatment approaches that can have a greater public mental health impact.
Abstract
The present study aimed to examine the efficacy of Problem Management Plus (PM+), a low-intensity, cognitive-behavioral therapy-based (CBT) intervention, in improving the mental health of conflict-exposed individuals using a randomized-controlled trial (RCT) design. A sample of 26 individuals participated in the study, randomized into PM+ (i.e., treatment; n = 14) and waitlist control (i.e., WLC; n = 12) groups. Results show that those in the PM + group showed improved mental health outcomes at posttest, while the WLC group did not show any significant improvement. There was also a significant difference in the psychological wellbeing, functionality, posttraumatic stress disorder, anxiety, and depression scores between the two groups at posttest, with the PM + group demonstrating lower severity of symptoms and better wellbeing. The results support the efficacy of PM + as a transdiagnostic CBT-based intervention in the current sample.
Abstract
This study quantified the prevalence of common mental disorders (CMDs) and identified associated predictors among Filipino civil servants who served as essential workers during the COVID-19 pandemic. Using a web-based survey of 572 civil servants, we administered established scales (K-6, GAD-7, PHQ-9, PRD). The findings revealed a substantial burden of CMDs: 56.5% for psychological distress, 30.6% for major depression (MDD), and 25.9% for generalized anxiety (GAD). Multiple logistic regression analysis identified several key risk factors. Sociodemographic risks included younger age (30 and below) across all CMDs and being female for MDD and psychological distress. Pandemic-related risks highlighted the critical role of difficulties in caregiving responsibilities and a lack of social activities/interaction in predicting anxiety and depression. Additionally, work-family conflict predicted distress. The results underscore the urgent need for targeted, risk-informed mental health support for this critical workforce.